From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Jun 30 10:24:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from xylan.com (postal.xylan.com [208.8.0.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41C514C07 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:24:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from mailhub.xylan.com by xylan.com (8.8.7/SMI-SVR4 (xylan-mgw 2.2 [OUT])) id KAA22979; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:24:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omni.xylan.com by mailhub.xylan.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4 (mailhub 2.1 [HUB])) id KAA22694; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:24:18 -0700 Received: from softweyr.com (dyn2.utah.xylan.com) by omni.xylan.com (4.1/SMI-4.1 (xylan engr [SPOOL])) id AA03286; Wed, 30 Jun 99 10:24:16 PDT Message-Id: <377A52C0.A85DE12E@softweyr.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:24:16 -0600 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Jesus Monroy Cc: John Baldwin , freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, Konrad Heuer , Sue Blake Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [FreeBSD Man Pages]]] References: <19990630145327.15958.qmail@nw171.netaddress.usa.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jesus Monroy wrote: > > John Baldwin wrote: > > > > On 30-Jun-99 Jesus Monroy wrote: > > > Sue Blake wrote: > > >> On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 02:28:16AM -0700, Jesus Monroy wrote: > > >> > Konrad Heuer wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > To my mind *one* of the points where FreeBSD is really good are > > >> > > the man > > >> > > pages. I don't have a proposal how to use this fact for promoting > > >> > > FreeBSD, > > >> > > but my intention is to mention that strength of FreeBSD here. > > >> > > > > >> > Very incorrect. Just a few days ago I show that 15% > > >> > of the online whatis(1) and man(1) records where > > >> > incorrect. > > >> > > >> For one definition of "incorrect". What you showed does not detract > > >> from the point that Konrad is making. > > >> > > >> > > > Wait a minute. Where is this arrogant attitude coming from! > > > The results plainly should wrong pages index, bad references > > > and missing descriptions. > > > > > > Please explain your idea (or definition of "correct"). > > > (Please note I know where all the IEEE papers are on > > > correct. So think this through before you popoff.) > > > > Relatively speaking they are a heck of a lot better than manpagse for > > some > > commercial Unices. They may not be perfect, but they're a heck of a lot > > closer.. and that was the original poster's point, which your survey has > > nothing to do with. > > > Well, as long as we are going to insert the foot, let's do > it right. Thank you for following along folks in the game > of "who's foot will be inserted first?" Yours, of course. Do you have problems with athelete's mouth? If you really feel you MUST continue this assinine tirade, STOP CHANGING THE SUBJECT LINE YOU ASSHOLE! -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message