From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Nov 20 17:06:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA16450 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 20 Nov 1998 17:06:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kerouac.deepwell.com (deepwell.com [209.63.174.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA16445 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 1998 17:06:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@deepwell.com) Received: (qmail 5774 invoked from network); 21 Nov 1998 01:31:42 -0000 Received: from terry.dcomm.net (HELO terry) (209.63.174.33) by deepwell.com with SMTP; 21 Nov 1998 01:31:42 -0000 Message-Id: <4.1.19981120170141.009f1830@mail1.dcomm.net> X-Sender: freebsd@mail.deepwell.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 17:07:18 -0800 To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: Deepwell Internet Subject: Frontpage Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I know there was a big thread a while back on Frontpage Extensions and FreeBSD. I know some of you have it running successfully on freebsd. I have the following options: run FPE on a FreeBSD 3.0 box in Linux emulation mode run FPE on a FreeBSD 3.0 box with the BSDI port. downgrade to a previous version of FreeBSD (2.2.7 or 2.2.6) Instal (ugh) Redhat on a sacrificial lamb and run it there. Now I don't want to get a million people telling me how insecure FPE is. I realize it has weaknesses, but the other option is running an NT box, and I really really don't want to do that anymore. Can you give me some plusses/minuses about operating it in these different ways? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message