From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 11 14:05:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44DD116A418 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:05:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timo.schoeler@riscworks.net) Received: from relay.riscworks.net (v32231.1blu.de [88.84.154.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DC213C458 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:05:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timo.schoeler@riscworks.net) Received: from zoidberg.riscworks.net (f054174248.adsl.alicedsl.de [78.54.174.248]) by relay.riscworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACD5C6F189C; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:05:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from zoidberg.riscworks.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zoidberg.riscworks.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 720761CB3; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:05:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:05:29 +0100 From: Timo Schoeler To: Harti Brandt Message-Id: <20080111150529.e96a7b1d.timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> In-Reply-To: <20080111145557.C60251@knop-beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <47873B06.9010603@riscworks.net> <200801111058.m0BAwAMG001075@lurza.secnetix.de> <20080111140144.59498431.timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> <47876B39.3040703@FreeBSD.org> <20080111145128.abb76a0a.timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> <20080111145557.C60251@knop-beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> Organization: RISCworks Environtech X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; amd64-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD's problems as seen by the BSDForen.de community X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:05:26 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Thus Harti Brandt spake on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:59:26 +0100 (CET): > On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Timo Schoeler wrote: > > TS>No, I didn't. I said that the work is done ineffectively as he's > TS>doing underprioritized stuff. Working on higher prioritized stuff > TS>would be more efficient, and would help the project even more. > TS> > TS>Given the assumption that the developer is able to do both, the > TS>Xmas tree as well as importing ZFS v9 into the tree. > TS> > TS>(I don't see the point that when somebody is really *capable* of > TS>doing both things, why should (s)he do the 'lower priority' thing. > TS>If you are at the olympic stadium and you're the best sprinter, > TS>you wouldn't join the marathon...!) > > Sorry, this is just crap. I'm a rather bad guitar player, at least > much worse than I'm a programmer. Yet I enjoy playing Joe Pass at 1/4 > the speed while I could import ZFS during that time ... People just > bring to FreeBSD what they like to do, not what would be the best for > you or others. If you want them to change priorities according to > YOUR needs, pay them money. > > harti Harti, you didn't get the point. You can also lead you dog into my yard, as long as you don't work on FreeBSD noone cares, really. The difference is *when* working on FreeBSD *what* do to -- xmas tree or ZFS. I thought this argumentation was pretty straightforward, but sometimes 2 +2 is really 5... Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHh3epUY3eBSqOgOMRCki4AJ9wzhaAb+Qn5Qieb0SH50lT12S9SgCgmWHN Kfl2EzrdbrvyNLg4V4OgYIU= =riKO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----