From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan  2 03:05:30 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F30A416A4CE; Fri,  2 Jan 2004 03:05:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.macomnet.ru (relay.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5D0C243D2D; Fri,  2 Jan 2004 03:05:28 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru)
Received: from news1.macomnet.ru (w16tunor@news1.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.14])
	by relay.macomnet.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i02B5Qtn31011511;
	Fri, 2 Jan 2004 14:05:26 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 14:05:26 +0300 (MSK)
From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <3FF4C96F.4060606@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20040102140436.D53674@news1.macomnet.ru>
References: <200401010040.i010eekf000369@mist.nodomain>
	<3FF4C96F.4060606@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Dan Strick <strick@covad.net>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: dan@mist.nodomain
Subject: Re: Another 5.2-RC2 experience
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 11:05:30 -0000

[...]
> > 3) The UFS1 file system super block summary data incompatibility (with
> >    FreeBSD 4.9) is still a problem.
>
> Please refresh my memory on this problem, I thought that all-known UFS
> incompatibilities had been dealt with in some fashion.

http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=100639+0+archive/2003/freebsd-current/20030323.freebsd-current

IIRC there is a PR.

-- 
Maxim Konovalov, maxim@macomnet.ru, maxim@FreeBSD.org