From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 09:31:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF224106567E for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:31:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957F98FC1B for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC5135C22 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:44:51 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F83FDE1.1050804@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:31:13 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F7E498E.7070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F804679.2040803@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F836A65.7080402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F837E27.8070503@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F83E7EC.10906@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:31:16 -0000 On 04/10/12 18:06, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Da Rock > wrote: >> On 04/10/12 16:30, Chuck Swiger wrote: >>> On Apr 9, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Da Rock wrote: >>> [ ... ] >>>>> If you think there is a missing dependency, then doing send-pr with the >>>>> fix is a reasonable procedure. >>>> I was only thinking the maintainer might want to know and fix and test >>>> themselves before commit. I know I would as a maintainer. >>> Sure-- a PR with a change to a port will be assigned to the maintainer to >>> test and approve. >> >> Ah. I wasn't aware that was the case, especially if the maintainer cannot >> specifically commit. >>> Note that I'd gotten the impression that you had installed libnet >>> separately, which would be a library and not just a build dependency... >> I am still looking into it as time permits, but I'm not sure I understand >> the difference? I had to install libnet separately in order to build. How >> does that fit in your comment? I'm still a very newbie developer so I'm not >> always accurately understanding the terms, I think. > I'm not sure, which libnet you are referring to. None of the Sambas > should really depend from anything called libnet. At least - > externally. Thats what I'm trying to figure out now, well, as my time permits anyway :) > > Also, please show the content of your /etc/make.conf, it could be that > you are mangling include flags. make.conf: end of make.conf ;) Well thats not entirely accurate, I only have a USE_OPENSSL_BASE and the usual perl stuff and thats all. I get a bit of a kick out of that when someone asks if there's something in the make.conf- I only use some of the kerberos options on occasion when called for (not lately), but I learnt my lesson a long time ago: don't touch the make.conf! I created some issues in the past doing that... :)