Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2022 21:06:30 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: haskell@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 264192] lang/ghc: poudriere based build used odd mix of devel/llvm10 and system toolchain Message-ID: <bug-264192-16154-X7FFh0Phmr@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-264192-16154@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-264192-16154@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D264192 --- Comment #56 from Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to Mikael Urankar from comment #31) Just a summary note about the status of my armv7 experiments, and that I'm going to stop attempting them. I'll not even be tracking the armv7 or aarch64 status any more. > Yes, the haddock is only a problem in aarch64 / armv7 context (it works > fine on a armv7 board) But not on other armv7 boards, in my context: The Orange Pi Plus 2E does not manage to build it, failing well before haddock is the issue. (Other, earlier comments have some details.) So far as I know, no one has managed to isolate specific criteria for what it takes to allow builds to work on armv7 --or for armv7 via an=20 aarch64 that can execute armv7 code. (Likely a similar point goes for "on armv6".) Possibly it is just the process size limit and memory usage both being sufficiently large. But no one has indicated a pair of figures that are known to work if the armv7 context allows the sizes. I do not have a context that can explore that: too limited for the process size at least. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-264192-16154-X7FFh0Phmr>