From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 6 2:19:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from turtle.looksharp.net (cc360882-a.strhg1.mi.home.com [24.2.221.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85E215456 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 02:19:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net) Received: from localhost (bsdx@localhost) by turtle.looksharp.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA24405; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 05:17:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 05:17:34 -0500 (EST) From: Adam To: "Alexey N. Dokuchaev" Cc: Alwyn Schoeman , Salvo Bartolotta , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FFS vs ext2fs (Was: Re: Not enough information) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Agh, I meant Alwyn. Need sleep. On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Adam wrote: >Alexey made no statement about performance, so don't turn this into an >issue it isn't. > >On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Alexey N. Dokuchaev wrote: > >>> Recently FreeBSD's not so great filesystem got corrupted. Guess what got >>>damaged? Package information, so now I can't get any information on >>>installed packages.UPgrading ports, I mean installed ports? Probably the >>>only point its got going >> >>Bullsh*t! FFS totally outperforms ext2fs, and I've never heard any >>opposite statements. >> >>./danfe >> >> >> >> >>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >>with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message >> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message