From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 26 20:57:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F56F1065674; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:57:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@lev.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (77-93-215-190.static.masterinter.net [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE498FC0A; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:57:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@lev.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25019CB27A; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:53:17 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wlBujeqPq8Qu; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:53:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from lev.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795929CB769; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:53:15 +0100 (CET) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by lev.vlakno.cz (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id mAQKrFNb007218; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:53:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:53:15 +0100 From: Roman Divacky To: Brooks Davis Message-ID: <20081126205315.GA6950@freebsd.org> References: <20081125173657.GA50429@freebsd.org> <9bbcef730811251246nf39e825s95a25ae394948e06@mail.gmail.com> <492D3E95.1000106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20081126162347.GA81416@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081126162347.GA81416@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.1 BETA 2 vs Opensolaris vs Ubuntu performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:57:42 -0000 > They can work on LLVM support and integration. Apple is putting a lot > of effort into both llvm-gcc and clang. From the outside, it looks like > they consider that their future. As such, it may well be ours. I am doing some work on llvm+clang, it's still not very mature but looks very promising.... if you are interested contact me :) roman