From owner-freebsd-security Fri Mar 12 10:19:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from elixir.e.kth.se (elixir.e.kth.se [130.237.48.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CBF154B0 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:19:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lha@e.kth.se) Received: from hummel.e.kth.se (hummel.e.kth.se [130.237.43.135]) by elixir.e.kth.se (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA05434; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 19:18:19 +0100 (MET) Received: (from lha@localhost) by hummel.e.kth.se (8.9.2/8.9.2) id TAA20641; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 19:18:15 +0100 (MET) From: Love To: Wes Peters Cc: Fernando Schapachnik , robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org, dillon@apollo.backplane.com, andrewr@slack.net, archie@whistle.com, andrew@squiz.co.nz, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: disapointing security architecture References: <199903121509.MAA19155@ns1.sminter.com.ar> <36E94946.5DFC60DF@softweyr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: 12 Mar 1999 19:18:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: Wes Peters's message of Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:05:10 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Wes Peters writes: > Fernando Schapachnik wrote: > > > > > The Solaris folk now appear to have ACL support in the base OS install + > > > FS. Where did they find the space to store the ACLs? Adding any more > > > > I think they store it sacrificing 3rd. level indirection, but I'm not sure. > [...] > Nope, it doesn't look like the ACL information is referenced in the > disk inode. They must store it somewhere else on the volume. Weird. They store it in the shadow inode. Love To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message