Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 22:49:12 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new project, old license Message-ID: <86u0gx3os7.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.62.0509060924400.21386@pilchuck.reedmedia.net> (Jeremy C. Reed's message of "Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:28:49 -0700 (PDT)") References: <Pine.NEB.4.62.0509060924400.21386@pilchuck.reedmedia.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net> writes: > The original license had the "AS IS" disclaimer that specifically > mentioned the project's name. > > Is it acceptable to rewrite to say ... IS PROVIDED BY THE foo AND bar > PROJECTs "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS ... The license normally says "BY THE FOO PROJECT AND ITS CONTRIBUTORS" or "BY ITS AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS" in which case I'd consider the author of the derivative work a contributor and leave it at that. IANAL. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86u0gx3os7.fsf>