From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 18 17:20:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A12916A403 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E4743D67 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:20:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3IHKFo1064989 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:20:15 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k3IHKFYA064988; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:20:15 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:20:15 GMT Message-Id: <200604181720.k3IHKFYA064988@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Marcus von Appen Cc: Subject: Re: ports/95834: [PATCH] devel/py-game: portlint(1) fixes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marcus von Appen List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:20:20 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/95834; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Marcus von Appen To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Alexander Botero-Lowry Subject: Re: ports/95834: [PATCH] devel/py-game: portlint(1) fixes Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:10:58 +0200 --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On, Tue Apr 18, 2006, Alexander Botero-Lowry wrote: > DISTNAME=3D py${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}release >=20 > is actually what it should be, sorry about that stupid mistake on my part= =2E. >=20 > Alex With that additional line, I do not see any problems. The patch (including the DISTNAME change) then can be applied. Thanks for that. Regards Marcus --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFERR2ho/JpszXavhwRAt4QAJ9fCUOVW2iBVwwTzN9gdRz96XPAEwCfZWZN znp9+qjzsY32eBcf7x2hRMo= =oaGY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--