Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 23:02:11 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199633] graphics/jpeg-turbo: includes should be installed, rework proposed Message-ID: <bug-199633-13-iLJUPPkNS1@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-199633-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-199633-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199633 Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bapt@FreeBSD.org, | |bdrewery@FreeBSD.org Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |amdmi3@FreeBSD.org |org | --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Adam Weinberger from comment #3) > I'm not entirely clear on the implications of provides/requires in the new pkg. > If that will allow libjpeg-turbo to behave like a proper drop-in replacement, then adding the missing header files to the libjpeg-turbo port seems like a reasonable option. That's something related to what we needed, but afaik it is still far from being usable for the purpose. pkg people, any comments? Summarizing, jpeg and jpeg-turbo install the same set of includes/libs. Another port requires jpeg-turbo specifically, but most other ports depend on jpeg. Any way to solve this without using filename suffixes? > If the libjpeg-turbo port can't be modified to let it act as a proper drop-in replacement, them I'm 100% with you on the changes you proposed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-199633-13-iLJUPPkNS1>