From owner-freebsd-python@freebsd.org Wed Jun 29 09:32:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E4CB866C4 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:32:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC022697 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:32:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 99ABBB866C3; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: python@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994C0B866C2 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:32:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 890262694 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:32:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u5T9WH9i017780 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:32:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210685] [exp-run] lang/python27: Update to 2.7.12 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:32:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: python@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? exp-run? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:32:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210685 --- Comment #8 from Kubilay Kocak --- (In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #7) We technically don't need to (nor have we) exp-run Python ports on each upd= ate. exp-run ? was only set as a candidate/option, and it can be removed If combined changes are run in the same exp-run, it may obscure the underly= ing cause of the failure, particularly if there's interactions between the two changes However, if it is in fact too burdensome, feel free to run them in the same exp-run, applying each patch from their respective issues Given the setuptools changes applies to all versions of python (via the respective py-setuptoolsXY ports), they should be applied separately, and t= hey dont/shouldnt block each other, hence the request in comment 6 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=