From owner-freebsd-alpha Mon Jun 5 21:17:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from agnostic.union.cynic.net (24-29-157-20.nyc.rr.com [24.29.157.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBBD37B55E for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 21:17:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cjs@cynic.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by agnostic.union.cynic.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA08434; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 00:17:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: agnostic.union.cynic.net: cjs owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 00:17:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Curt Sampson X-Sender: cjs@agnostic.union.cynic.net To: Mark Abene Cc: "Koster, K.J." , freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: JDK status? In-Reply-To: <20000605164236.D6628@radicalmedia.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Mark Abene wrote: > concerned as to what the current licensing issues are with Sun, since Sun's > latest JDK licensing agreement is preventing him from porting the latest JDK. > Since I'm not familiar with the current JDK licensing issues, I figured I'd > ask you. Under what conditions do we as porters have access to the JDK 1.2.2 > source code? I'd be interested in knowing about this too, since I'd be willing to put some work towards getting the 1.2.2 JDK up and runing on NetBSD/alpha and NetBSD/i386. But I've not much interest unless it can be distributed, and last I checked, the new license for 1.2 prevented that. cjs -- Curt Sampson 917 532 4208 http://www.netbsd.org Human speech is like a cracked tin kettle, on which we hammer out tunes to make bears dance when we long to move the stars. --Gustave Flaubert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message