From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 1 23:36:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1712716A403 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 23:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF83413C441 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 23:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 01 Jan 2007 18:36:11 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MSL26473; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 18:36:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-122-188-192.c3-0.avec-ubr15.nyr-avec.ny.cable.rcn.com (HELO [192.168.1.107]) ([209.122.188.192]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 01 Jan 2007 18:36:06 -0500 Message-ID: <45999AE4.8080600@tandon.net> Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:36:04 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070101225851.ZBRG60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> In-Reply-To: <20070101225851.ZBRG60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portupgrade - skipping -held by user- meaning? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:36:11 -0000 Vizion wrote: > What does it mean when the message > ---> skipping [portname] because it is held by user (specify -f to force) Does said port appear in the HOLD_PKGS array within pkgtools.conf? From that file: # HOLD_PKGS: array # # This is a list of ports you don't want portupgrade(1) to upgrade, # portversion(1) to suggest upgrading, or pkgdb(1) to fix. # You can use wildcards ("ports glob" and "pkgname glob"). # -f/--force with each command will override the held status. > and when & why should -f be specify? When you want to force the upgrade of a package even though you've "held" it in pkgtools.conf. -- Sahil Tandon