From owner-freebsd-net Wed May 13 11:35:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA17761 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 13 May 1998 11:35:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA17399; Wed, 13 May 1998 11:33:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA27541; Wed, 13 May 1998 11:26:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd027527; Wed May 13 18:26:34 1998 Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 11:26:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Petri Helenius , Guido van Rooij , Peter Wemm , dag-erli@ifi.uio.no, net@FreeBSD.ORG, core@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <6974.895047065@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I guess the NRL version is no longer being used or what? On Wed, 13 May 1998, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > I've been using the INRIA stuff for >6 months now and I'm happy with > > that with the exception of the pain I've to go through when I need to > > match -stable patches to the INRIA code which gets up-ported only > > every now and then. > > Great, great, now go run the WIDE stuff and tell us how it compares! :-) > > Seriously, that's the problem here. We don't need advocates who have > tried only ONE implementation comprehensively - we can find plenty of > such folks already and they don't help us at all in making a decision > about which implementation to back. :-( > > - Jordan > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message