From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 24 20:25:48 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3681065672
	for <freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:25:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from seklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com
	(mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.72.84])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DA18FC1F
	for <freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:25:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from seklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from [192.168.2.161] ([206.210.89.202])
	by mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (StrongMail Enterprise
	4.1.1.4(4.1.1.4-47689)); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:08:09 -0400
X-VirtualServerGroup: Default
X-MailingID: 00000::00000::00000::00000::::24
X-SMHeaderMap: mid="X-MailingID"
X-Destination-ID: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org
X-SMFBL: ZnJlZWJzZC1qYWlsQEZyZWVCU0Qub3Jn
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us; s=noc_cfi_pgh_pa_us_key_dkim; l=425;
	t=1248466089; i=@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:
	In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:
	X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=n8i5bVxo2y/iejhgxxql4j0zz
	QE=; b=rkHMXLukGsEDbBgINxVu+Hg2PM1IItKmdsmTSFt/pPq0S1hHl4vVHNhsP
	w9iJsI18sxCitDpbqQvdGr/hzo0r6mY5ishEK2w3fYPXLGXmVmiS6sksO5s3uq1t
	7CApgHj
From: "Brian A. Seklecki" <seklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@secnap.net>
In-Reply-To: <4A69DD4A.60406@secnap.net>
References: <4A55055D.8030902@secnap.net>
	<1248451401.24024.1262.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com>
	<4A69DD4A.60406@secnap.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:25:46 -0400
Message-Id: <1248467146.24024.2056.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 (2.26.3-1.fc11)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ssl accelerator cards and jail?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" <freebsd-jail.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail>,
	<mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail>,
	<mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:25:49 -0000

On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 12:11 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> thanks.  maybe I'll look into one of those and give it a try on 7.1
> (worries me that 7.2 has a shorted lifespan than 7.1...)

That's by design per the releng document.

Hey, my ESXi 4.0 machine is PCI-Express only.  My Broadcom cards are
32bit PCI-X.  I had a PCI-E but had to return it as a demo.

Give me a few days to hack some testing together.   ~BAS