From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 7 23:35:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from grimreaper.grondar.za (grimreaper.grondar.za [196.7.18.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96EFA37C0A6 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 23:35:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grimreaper.grondar.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA04413; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 08:35:02 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.za) Message-Id: <200006080635.IAA04413@grimreaper.grondar.za> To: George Michaelson Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: heimdal/kerberosV pam module? References: <10076.960444449@dstc.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <10076.960444449@dstc.edu.au> ; from George Michaelson "Thu, 08 Jun 2000 16:07:29 +1000." Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 08:35:01 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Kerberos is my baby. > What I infer is: > > Heimdal is still 'experimental' Correct. > Kerberos V is mostly back-links to the imported heimdal > pam is stuck at Kerberos_IV for the time being Correct. Correct. Care to write a K5/Heimdal PAM? > /etc/services is 'almost' ok for Kerberos V Patches? > the port in /usr/ports/security/heimdal is pretty well ok but > runs from /usr/local, and doesn't use exactly the same formats > for data: you can do some things off the /usr/src/ installed code > but some others don't work. I intend to update the mainstream stuff to the latest Heimdal soonish. As for differences; patches or pointers, please? :-) M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message