From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 26 23:49:44 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2F81065672;
	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:49:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from 65-241-43-5.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4390D179B84;
	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:49:22 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4DB75A02.9050600@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:49:22 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110319 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lev@FreeBSD.org
References: <4DB70949.6090104@FreeBSD.org> <4DB70F97.1070809@FreeBSD.org>
	<4DB71311.7080203@FreeBSD.org> <4DB71654.5060008@FreeBSD.org>
	<5710150841.20110427004608@serebryakov.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <5710150841.20110427004608@serebryakov.spb.ru>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org>,
	Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:49:44 -0000

On 04/26/2011 13:46, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Andrey.
> You wrote 26 апреля 2011 г., 23:00:36:
>
>>> files, but there is precedent for doing so for changes like this, and as
>>> long as we are not relying on mergemaster to _fix_ the problem, I'm Ok
>>> with doing it that way. So I will stay tuned to see how this develops.
>> mergemaster usually used a bit later than it can help, i mean that we
>> recommend run it after installing kernel and first reboot.
>    There is special option `-p', am I right?

mergemaster is not the answer to fixing this problem for the user. 
Please read the whole thread for the answer to "why not?"


-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/