Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:49:22 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: lev@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org>, Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? Message-ID: <4DB75A02.9050600@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5710150841.20110427004608@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <4DB70949.6090104@FreeBSD.org> <4DB70F97.1070809@FreeBSD.org> <4DB71311.7080203@FreeBSD.org> <4DB71654.5060008@FreeBSD.org> <5710150841.20110427004608@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/26/2011 13:46, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Andrey. > You wrote 26 апреля 2011 г., 23:00:36: > >>> files, but there is precedent for doing so for changes like this, and as >>> long as we are not relying on mergemaster to _fix_ the problem, I'm Ok >>> with doing it that way. So I will stay tuned to see how this develops. >> mergemaster usually used a bit later than it can help, i mean that we >> recommend run it after installing kernel and first reboot. > There is special option `-p', am I right? mergemaster is not the answer to fixing this problem for the user. Please read the whole thread for the answer to "why not?" -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DB75A02.9050600>