From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 14:29:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9938816A420 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:29:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80C7343D6E for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:29:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 95776 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Dec 2005 14:29:47 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OkSOeF/gmcnZSdwOsC48PSGOz4SIBfVggW0rjDsjkjXA5Tqq7rljdA/Ymerfi04OGUeyOFpvfPNjamXEE65RG9+fMno6xOF7W8Hxns7ZY8tP5T2Vb2q7gdsPFzhcDUAnp6wIQTVXovUjy5sh/0bco3ZW9SVGgJPZ3N7pdc+NIwA= ; Message-ID: <20051225142947.95774.qmail@web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:29:47 PST Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:29:47 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: dick hoogendijk , freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <20051225135429.GA26359@lothlorien.nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:29:50 -0000 --- dick hoogendijk wrote: > On 24 Dec Danial Thom wrote: > > Schwab Streetsmart > > Accounting Software (CA) > > Quicken > > Photoshop > > Adobe Acrobat (for creating PDFs) > > > > Those are the ones I use daily. Surely there > are > > some half-assed alternatives for some of > these, > > but if I have to use something inferior to > use > > FreeBSD then thats a point against it. > > NO. It's not a point against the OS. It merely > demonstrates why lots of > people stay with windows. NOT because the OS is > better, but its support > by *third party soft-hardware* is better. > > Windows itself (the OS) is worse than FreeBSD > (imho). Those 3th party > people are responsable for the leading role of > microsoft. > Not MS itself. > > I'm convinced (though not proven yet) that the > software you mentioned > above will run on FreeBSD (if ported natively > to the OS) at least as > good, but I guess even better, then it does on > windows. "worse" and "more useful" are different criteria. A harley davidson may be a better built machine than any given SUV, but its not as practical or useful. Its usefulness is limited to enthusiasts and those with disdain for society, much like the un*x desktop. __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com