From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 10 14:31:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FE616A4CE; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:31:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net (mtaw6.prodigy.net [64.164.98.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7221843D39; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:31:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (fc33378790137fc3cd476b54f0d17fdd@adsl-67-119-53-203.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.203]) by mtaw6.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2AMUgQ4022537; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:30:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B139353AB2; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:31:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:31:41 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20040310223141.GA4848@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200403100902.i2A922vx092031@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040310093001.GA85013@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040310033538.S9942@odysseus.silby.com> <20040310140322.U875@bo.vpnaa.bet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040310140322.U875@bo.vpnaa.bet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: "cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org" cc: Mike Silbersack cc: "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" cc: "cvs-all@FreeBSD.org" cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/rtc Makefile ports/emulators/rtc/files rtc.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:31:43 -0000 --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:05:27PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Mike Silbersack wrote: >=20 > > > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > *Actually* make rtc work on post-502104 -CURRENT. > > > > > > Is a PORTREVISION bump needed? > > > > > > Kris > > > > It couldn't hurt, thanks for the reminder. >=20 > I know I harp on this a lot, but I'm curious about this one. Why is a > portrevision bump useful here? I see two possibilities: >=20 > 1. A user has a working version of the port. > 2. A user did not have a working version of the port, therefore it > wasn't installed. >=20 > In the first case the bump is harmful, since it causes the user to > upgrade something for no benefit. In the second case, the bump is > meaningless. >=20 > Is there a part of this picture that I'm not seeing? As I understood it, prior to this commit there was a window where the port would compile but not run. This would have required special action for the user to recover from (i.e. manual recompile). Kris --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAT5dNWry0BWjoQKURAjYAAJ9VINtdg9pjnEdSmp8pzGAlez6XNACgpp1e kG1j6RwoN+O9xI+WX3t0WLo= =os6/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh--