From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 16 23:20:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160631065670 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049D18FC1C for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3GNK27V023657 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:20:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m3GNK2hx023656; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:20:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:20:02 GMT Message-Id: <200804162320.m3GNK2hx023656@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org From: Paul Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/122780: [lagg] tcpdump on lagg interface during high pps wedges netcode X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:20:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR amd64/122780; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Paul To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, paul@gtcomm.net Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/122780: [lagg] tcpdump on lagg interface during high pps wedges netcode Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:40:53 -0400 It seems to happen while attaching the BPF to the interface. I ran a tcpdump first, and then started the traffic and I saw the traffic in tcpdump, but after traffic is going and then issuing tcpdump command, instantly locks. I also just had a lockup with adding and removing ospf networks in quagga ospfd where the entire machine froze when I removed a network (from a lagg interface) , I could not repeat this problem. :/