From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 14 07:19:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2381C16A41C; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:19:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D824B43D4C; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:19:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5E7JEeD055836; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:19:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j5E7JESe055835; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:19:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:19:14 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20050614071914.GD55703@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200506122320.j5CNKQAF023114@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050613021258.GA5242@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050613071337.GA25893@ip.net.ua> <200506131122.28463.peter@wemm.org> <20050613192423.GC4323@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050613212626.GC6385@ip.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050613212626.GC6385@ip.net.ua> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64/82178: missing 32bit subsystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:19:15 -0000 On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 12:26:26AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 12:24:23PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:22:28AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > > > On Monday 13 June 2005 12:13 am, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 07:12:58PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > > There is a known issue that there are some missing bits in the 5.4 > > > > > src/release/Makefile such that the 'base' tarball doesn't contain > > > > > the 32-bit ld.so and 32-bit shared libs. > > > > > > > > This should be fixed in Makefile.inc1, not in release/Makefile. > > > > > > That looks a step in the right direction, but I wonder if we can have > > > this stuff in a seperate sysinstall-selectable distribution instead of > > > the base dist? > > > > Agreed, it would be nice to have more granularity in our install bits. > > > OK, I will do it (modulo the sysinstall part). I can do that part if you like. Just send the patch that will create the 32compat/ directory and splited 32compat.XY files. Is 32compat or 32bit a suitable name, or do we want a different one? "compat32" may be confused with FreeBSD-3.2 compatibility libs. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)