From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 20 14:57:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCFD37B401; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 14:57:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BF643F85; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 14:57:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from master.gorean.org (12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com[12.234.22.23]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51) with SMTP id <20030420215731051004tb29e>; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 21:57:32 +0000 Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 14:57:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Garrett Wollman In-Reply-To: <200304172044.h3HKi52w032010@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Message-ID: <20030420145651.Q631@znfgre.tberna.bet> References: <20030417141133.GA4155@madman.celabo.org> <20030417144449.GA4530@madman.celabo.org> <20030417173607.GA2682@madman.celabo.org> <200304172044.h3HKi52w032010@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: new NSS X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 21:57:33 -0000 On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Garrett Wollman wrote: > < said: > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 12:23:46AM +0700, Max Khon wrote: > >> it will not work in single user mode when /usr is not mounted, right? > > > That's right. > > >> do you plan to migrate to shared root just like NetBSD did a few months ago? > > > Not me personally, no. :-) I would welcome it, but I'm not going to push > > it. > > One possible way around this is to add an external resolver (like > Solaris's `nscd'); the static library can use a stub routine to call > the resolver if possible (i.e., the machine is running multiuser), and > then fall back to the built-in databases if this fails. This way, > only the users who needed loadable NSS modules would pay the cost. As long as this is 100% optional, fine. nscd on sun is an evil menace, and I'd hate to see us repeat the same mistakes. -- This .signature sanitized for your protection