From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 30 5:44:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (iclub.nsu.ru [193.124.222.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E082137B479; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 05:43:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (fjoe@localhost) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA90555; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 19:43:42 +0600 (NS) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 19:43:42 +0600 (NS) From: Max Khon To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, "Daniel M. Eischen" , jkh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is it late already? (-pthread) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, there! On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > The pthreads in RELENG_4 are quite broken (I mean, very-very broken). > Daniel M. Eischen has produced some patches which are > in -current for some time now, and were tested by me in -stable. > They were found to work great for all things I've tested it on. > It works *better* than the original implementation _anyway_, which is, > like I said is broken. > So, perhaps it wasn't in -current for a long time, but leaving the current > implementation is like shipping broken pthreads apriori what problems are you talking about? maybe this will explain problems we have with ACE+TAO on RELENG_4 /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message