From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 8 14:55:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9FC16A488 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:55:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932E613C4A5 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9012651980 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:55:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:55:16 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070208145516.2a8612f8@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <45CAB605.1070901@enabled.com> References: <45CA6413.6000400@enabled.com> <20070207193234.BFA4.GERARD@seibercom.net> <45CA7215.7030004@enabled.com> <45CA9854.7040903@u.washington.edu> <45CAB605.1070901@enabled.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.7.2 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: /tmp getting full form portmanager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 14:55:28 -0000 On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:32:53 -0800 Noah wrote: > > > > > > From rc.conf(5): > > > > clear_tmp_enable > > (bool) Set to ``YES'' to have /tmp cleaned at > > startup. > > And also daily_clean_tmps_enable (in periodic.conf) > > Why not setup a parallel (background) task with a wrapper script to > > delete some files when upgrading ports? Either that or find a > > (more) free partition and symlink /var/tmp to it. > > > > > yeah out of all the ideas this seems the easiest to implement and > just makes sense but I am having difficulties creating the sym link > for /tmp That doesn't make sense to me, it just sweeps the problem under the carpet. At the moment I'm in the middle of an upgrade with portmanager, and the *total* space used on /tmp is 1MB. How much of /tmp is actually in use by portmanager.