From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 23:04:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647D816A4CF; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:04:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av5-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (av5-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2375843D54; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:04:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com) Received: by av5-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 8A16137E81; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 01:04:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp2-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.183]) by av5-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CFDA37E49; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 01:04:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gadget (h130n1fls11o822.telia.com [213.64.66.130]) by smtp2-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5773937E46; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 01:04:51 +0200 (CEST) From: "Daniel Eriksson" To: "'John Baldwin'" , Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 01:04:49 +0200 Organization: Home Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcR/1z9O/J3eci7dRoG/kFoJv0oHqwAH1ihA In-Reply-To: <200408111501.23593.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 cc: 'Nate Lawson' Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/acpica acpi_pci_link.c acpi_pcib.cacpi_pcib_acpi.c acpi_pcib_pci.c acpi_pcibvar.h X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:04:52 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: > He's using an I/O APIC. These are probably all entries that > don't have a link > device but just a hardwired global interrupt number. Did you > test that case? Yes, I have "device apic" in my kernel config file. Is this a bad thing to do for a UP system? I remember googling "device apic" and finding at least some info that seemed to indicate that it was off by default in GENERIC simply because there are a few I/O APICs that are buggy, and that it actually helped on systems with properly working chips. Should I leave it out of my kernel config? (I'm just about to recompile with Nate's extra debug output patch.) /Daniel Eriksson