From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Wed Mar 21 15:37:57 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680EFF4E357; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 15:37:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c17:6c4b::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2FF3765ED; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 15:37:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from hps2016.home.selasky.org (unknown [62.141.128.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AC5C26061A; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 16:37:55 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: svn commit: r331306 - head/sys/dev/usb/controller To: Kyle Evans , Andrew Turner Cc: src-committers , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org References: <201803211517.w2LFHsHf007714@repo.freebsd.org> From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 16:37:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 15:37:57 -0000 On 03/21/18 16:24, Kyle Evans wrote: >> + { >> + .ep_end = 7, >> + .ep_fifosz_shift = 9, >> + .ep_fifosz_reg = MUSB2_VAL_FIFOSZ_512 | MUSB2_MASK_FIFODB, >> + }, > I'm afraid I'm not familiar with this- why did .ep_fifosz_shift for > this case drop to 9? frx = 10 in the temp < 8 case in the removals of > the following hunks. Mostly curious because the others seemed to stay > the same. > Hi Andrew, It might be an idea to keep the fifosz_shift at 10, else high-speed BULK traffic won't be double buffered, and this might affect performance. --HPS