From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 26 16:45:29 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E91B37B401; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 16:45:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03.attbi.com [204.127.202.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4DB43E4A; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 16:45:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org (12-232-168-4.client.attbi.com[12.232.168.4]) by sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03) with ESMTP id <2003012700452500300066qte>; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 00:45:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA99291; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 16:45:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 16:45:23 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: "David O'Brien" Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (FWD) cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha trap.c vm_machdep.c src/sys/ddb db_ps.c src/sys/i386/i386 critical.c exception.s genassym.c trap.c vm_machdep.c src/sys/ia64/ia64 trap.c vm_machdep.c src/sys/kern init_main.c kern_clock.c kern_exec.c kern_exit.c kern_ In-Reply-To: <20030127001110.GA93411@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 04:05:31PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > or simply check out the newer sources. > > Looking at the commit you made, it doesn't seem to address the other > issues of the commit this thread is trying to avoid. > > I guess you're not going to honor mine and others request for a full > backout of the commit pending farther review and testing? firstly, I have seen no requests for backout (and even if I had, it wouldn't concern me because it wasn't my commit in the first place), and secondly, I have seen no tinderbox failures (becasue I don't seem to be getting the mails these days) so my commit was purely from code inspection. I have seen no firsthand complaints of problems and have only responded to look for problems because I heard via robert that there were rumours of failures on secontary architecures. If anyone has a real problem they might make it easier by emailing me with them so I have a clue what is going on. As for the testing, the code in question is 99.5% in KSE specific code and THAT has been tested pretty thoroughly. A backout is David's decision but My personal thought is that it would be a retrograde move. What we need is to see the problems. I haven't seen a single firsthand report of any problem yet. I think the mail system at FreeBSD.org may have had a flaky morning.. How about sending me a mail saying what the problem is and then we might be making some forward progress.. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message