From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 26 19:38:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: perl@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05F7106566C; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:38:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CAB8FC1B; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcje9 with SMTP id je9so1866038bkc.13 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:38:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=H2fXGCMXUUTP4J/ipCl+sCC254SJj13paQRSX3cUhts=; b=fVSkwOkqafjcjmrEmY139s5e66gqT6MHD/sIGCn7nfYAgHWqZihGlkxWVYobW+Dhb+ kSTOiYAXQiydAh5nH2D8t5B/IITbiZWlf298ThqTrZoP0Bmpo0PRpFMzZpPzBQQz1dkK +whEHrMOC/AsHb7Clw3rR3RN8v/rx7SYSHp3BJE4vjnI8GougH7oHgPcav2FIF88ZkKq SHu0CuLWUd+B8k8JXHhxsBWCLtkZcxtjWpXqLYpGMWXNxxJw2lf/3VCN+Yn51O+Tr1r2 5UDxvTNvT+f0YX0j7dTJ+iJgs+OEbXvBz/TF0necIdU9uKVUml6+FGRWsAjdCjPOiODo kEPw== Received: by 10.204.129.14 with SMTP id m14mr3235365bks.7.1346009912094; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:38:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.10.141 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:38:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <503A794B.6060806@FreeBSD.org> References: <201208261840.q7QIe2nV047178@freefall.freebsd.org> <503A6F41.7070205@FreeBSD.org> <503A6FF9.5000207@FreeBSD.org> <503A70A7.30903@FreeBSD.org> <503A794B.6060806@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 20:38:01 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mSw3O9lu_hm9c-9aDnk5D2eRt8U Message-ID: To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Steve Wills , perl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/171084: [PATCH] shells/p5-Shell-Perl: update to 0.0022 X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:38:34 -0000 On 26 August 2012 20:30, Doug Barton wrote: > On 08/26/2012 12:03, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 26 August 2012 19:53, Doug Barton wrote: >>> On 08/26/2012 11:50, Steve Wills wrote: >>>> On 08/26/12 14:47, Doug Barton wrote: >>>>> Steve, >>>>> >>>>> Why do we have this sudden flood of PRs? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I'm bored and I got a local portscout instance working, so it's easier >>>> for me to see what's out of date. >>> >>> Ok .... but is there a way for you to relieve your boredom without >>> punishing us? :) Especially if you're going to end up taking the PR >>> anyway? >> >> Not really-- he's getting maintainer approval from a PR. >> >> If you know of any way to send a perl PR without it going via perl, please tell! > > The problem seems to be with the gnats auto-assigner: > > "^p5-" => "perl", > > Can we change that to be a list of ports that perl@ maintains? > > The alternative would be to set up a perl-bugs@ list. > Perhaps. Steve mentioned in a different reply to your email that he's working on changing priority; i.e. putting Submitter has GNATS access before perl@ wants this port's PRs. Hopefully that will be approved soon, but until then I fear procmail will be the only fix... Chris