From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 4 20:45:49 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F54D16A469; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 20:45:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@benji.nitro.dk) Received: from mx.nitro.dk (zarniwoop.nitro.dk [83.92.207.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603F813C46A; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 20:45:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@benji.nitro.dk) Received: from benji.nitro.dk (unknown [192.168.3.39]) by mx.nitro.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866F71E8C12; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 20:45:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by benji.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 2000) id E2595FE8E; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 22:46:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 22:46:07 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: "Bruce A. Mah" Message-ID: <20070804204607.GG974@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <200708042034.l74KYIBb061140@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200708042034.l74KYIBb061140@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 20:45:49 -0000 On 2007.08.04 20:34:18 +0000, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > bmah 2007-08-04 20:34:18 UTC > > FreeBSD doc repository > > Modified files: > en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install chapter.sgml > Log: > Use &sparc64; entity. I don't particularly agree with this, because > in this case we really should be using an entity that indicates a > variant of FreeBSD (such as &arch.sparc64; from the release notes), > not the commercial name of an architecture. However, adopt the > prevailing style of this file for consistency; we can sort this out > later. How about simply using "FreeBSD/sparc64" - the architecture name instead? (If what you mean is FreeBSD systems which can run on the Sparc64 architecture.) -- Simon L. Nielsen