Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:11:32 +0200
From:      des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To:        Mark Tinguely <tinguely@casselton.net>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au
Subject:   Re: IBM / FreeBSD Install problem
Message-ID:  <86y7ko2n8b.fsf@dwp.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <200704191736.l3JHad0E057895@casselton.net> (Mark Tinguely's message of "Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:36:39 -0500 (CDT)")
References:  <200704191736.l3JHad0E057895@casselton.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Tinguely <tinguely@casselton.net> writes:
> I suggested that in email too, but looking closer, I think the MAXCPU
> needs to be increased because the cpu number uses the apic_id. Or could
> that be changed with a logical CPU to APIC ID lookup?
>
> Isn't the APIC IDs programmable? not that I am suggesting that, I
> can think of headaches of all the places (like interrupt tables)
> where it needs to be changed, not to mention the worry that the
> lower APIC IDs were assigned to IOAPICs.

I don't know, you'd have to ask jhb@ about the details.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86y7ko2n8b.fsf>