From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 31 22:46:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C527F16A4CE; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 22:46:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D44D43D55; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 22:46:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from gamplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3p2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA18352; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 17:46:05 +1100 Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 17:46:04 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20031231152909.U1441@bo.vpnaa.bet> Message-ID: <20040101174225.T8243@gamplex.bde.org> References: <200312311742.hBVHgGb2051373@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031231152909.U1441@bo.vpnaa.bet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: "cvs-src@FreeBSD.org" cc: Gregory Neil Shapiro cc: "src-committers@FreeBSD.org" cc: "cvs-all@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/sendmail freebsd.mc X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 06:46:11 -0000 On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Doug Barton wrote: > On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > > > gshapiro 2003/12/31 09:42:16 PST > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) > > etc/sendmail freebsd.mc > > Log: > > MFC: Enable IPv6 by default but make it optional so it doesn't affect > > sites without IPv6. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.29 +3 -3 src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc > > Greg, > > What happens if I have a RELENG_4 system, with no IPv6 enabled, and I > mergemaster this change into my system? If everything keeps working with > no errors, then I think enabling this by default is probably ok. If not, > then I'd be concerned that this violotes the charter for -stable. Maybe the same as in -current. In -current, it affects sites without IPv6 by causing annoying messages like the following: Dec 25 22:19:30 gamplex sm-mta[507]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): opendaemonsocket: daemon IPv6: can't create server SMTP socket: Protocol not supported Dec 25 22:19:30 gamplex sm-mta[507]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): opendaemonsocket: daemon IPv6: optional socket disabled Bruce