Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 18:24:40 +0000 From: "Klaus T. Aehlig" <aehlig@linta.de> To: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Compiling ports in a post-9.0-RELEASE world Message-ID: <20110313182439.GA71055@curry.linta.de> In-Reply-To: <20110313120507.GA75195@megatron.madpilot.net> References: <4D7BED01.6000506@FreeBSD.org> <20110313120507.GA75195@megatron.madpilot.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, > I think some option like "CLANG_SAFE" or "USE_CLANG" (just > saying, perhaps a better name can be found) should be added [...] I also think that it would be very useful to go the same route as with MAKE_JOBS, i.e., ports can opt in, and in the long run opt out, of being build with clang. In my opinion, that should also include a variable like FORCE_MAKE_JOBS, say FORCE_CLANG, that makes all undecided ports (i.e., those neither CLANG_SAFE nor CLANG_UNSAFE) chose clang. Best, Klaus
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110313182439.GA71055>