Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:45:23 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>, Kip Macy <kmacy@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Driver patch to look at... Message-ID: <201302051345.23569.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <0D421326-9A80-4E21-A18E-E717F5C02164@lakerest.net> References: <D3AA078A-CD19-4228-A019-BE9C985895E2@lakerest.net> <201302051213.51401.jhb@freebsd.org> <0D421326-9A80-4E21-A18E-E717F5C02164@lakerest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 12:44:01 pm Randall Stewart wrote: > Actually, no it is used. > > If you look in if_var.h int he drbr_putback() function, it does > a buf_ring_swap when the old mbuf pointer does not equal the > new mbuf pointer. This *does* happen, I crashed at least once > yesterday when the igb driver did something to free the original > mbuf and return a new mbuf with the data (prepend or some such). > > I also have found several issues that I have fixed this morning.. its been > crash city on my test beds.. > > Here is the latest patch with all fixes and suggested changes from emaste (thanks Ed) Oh, I see now why that is needed. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201302051345.23569.jhb>