From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 29 22:40:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48CFA22 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:40:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C8CE54 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r2TMe1GD058420 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:40:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r2TMe1ug058418; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:40:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:40:01 GMT Message-Id: <201303292240.r2TMe1ug058418@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Darren Pilgrim Subject: Re: ports/177416: mail/postgrey has surfaced a bug in perl's taint checking X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Darren Pilgrim List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:40:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/177416; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Darren Pilgrim To: Paul Beard Cc: "bug-followup@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: ports/177416: mail/postgrey has surfaced a bug in perl's taint checking Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:36:08 -0700 On 2013-03-29 15:22, Paul Beard wrote: > Is p5-IO in the base, i.e., do the files installed by the port > replicate functionality that is now included in the base install? The > distinfo's modification date is May 17, 2011. The Makefile doesn't > test for a version. If so, why does it exist as a port? If it's only > for older versions, there's usually a test for that. There's plenty of outdated stuff in the ports tree. Historically a port didn't get deleted until it was unmaintained AND marked broken for a significant length of time. It's why portscout and its predecessors exist. > Is this just a namespace collision? Or cruft? Namespace collisions and multiple-implementation cruft are the characteristics of (what used to be called) CPAN-hell. :)