From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 10 17:06:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B104BD for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 17:06:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pj@smo.de) Received: from cetus.uberspace.de (cetus.uberspace.de [95.143.172.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F17852548 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 17:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7060 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2013 16:59:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.43.121?) (80.187.96.37) by cetus.uberspace.de with SMTP; 10 Nov 2013 16:59:33 -0000 Message-ID: <527FBB6B.5020706@smo.de> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 17:59:23 +0100 From: Philipp Ost User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:23.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/23.0 SeaMonkey/2.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block , Daniel O'Connor Subject: Re: cron(8) improvement References: <52792B60.1030309@allanjude.com> <488180AE-5C23-402A-BAA4-E3263D8C52BF@kientzle.com> <1383788977.14448.44112617.6F0D61A0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <527AFAA1.1040001@allanjude.com> <527BCA55.2000207@allanjude.com> <527C5D52.7030508@allanjude.com> <047405A8-B6EB-427B-A2E4-6254DD1A077B@orthanc.ca> <3E6377FF-69FE-48E4-BFB1-E5095A7FA1BB@orthanc.ca> <527C6DEF.6020102@allanjude.com> <527E3EB3.6000301@FreeBSD.org> <8034B822-F903-43D1-8BF6-DFAD7C22F5B0@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Current , Matthew Seaman X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 17:06:18 -0000 Warren Block schrieb: [...] >> ie either the file is named such that it is ignored by cron >> (preferable IMO) or the entries in them are commented out. > > Why not just use an additional entry in rc.conf? > > rsnapshot_cron="YES" > > (If there is a /usr/local/etc/cron.d/rsnapshot, add it to cron on > start/restart.) > > This brings up another problem. When a port is removed, what is done > with ports cron entries that have been user modified? Normally, > modified files would not be removed, but a cron entry for a removed port > definitely should not be running any more, even if the admin forgot to > remove the entry in rc.conf. But just removing the modified file is bad > also, because maybe the port was just removed as part of an upgrade. Given the above scenario, would it be acceptable to set the entry in rc.conf, $portname_cron=YES, to $portname_cron=NO without touching the modified files and inform the user about having done so? Philipp