From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 08:38:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E474F84B for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 08:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-31.italiaonline.it (smtp-31.italiaonline.it [212.48.25.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A0A6CC for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 08:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.41.168.244]) by smtp-31.iol.local with bizsmtp id NYen1p0175Gj3jK0XYenT7; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 09:38:50 +0100 x-libjamoibt: 1601 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=P4i0h0wu c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=JNjIPXLExT/h6yn7ncMiGQ==:117 a=JNjIPXLExT/h6yn7ncMiGQ==:17 a=9JsmjkwClTQA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=A92cGCtB03wA:10 a=i-faGNc2WGWiHBTemSgA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=6Bg9ZqP7s40A:10 a=6p21xZRwzykA:10 a=bQW7OGid7DwA:10 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sB28clEM016382; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 09:38:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <547D7A97.9030401@netfence.it> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 09:38:47 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Wolfskill Subject: Re: OpenCASCADE upgrade trouble References: <547CE0DF.4000202@netfence.it> <20141201214604.GX2559@albert.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <20141201214604.GX2559@albert.catwhisker.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, thierry@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 08:38:53 -0000 On 12/01/14 22:46, David Wolfskill wrote: > Please read ports/UPDATING entry 20141127; its advice may well be > relevant. Thanks for your answer, but this is not related. BTW I checked my port tree and have no such problem. Anyhow, I remember having this problem in the past; it was packing list related and choosing some set of options solved it; unfortunately those options are gone. bye & Thanks av.