From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 20 12:39:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2D8106564A; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2187F8FC0C; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from park.js.berklix.net (p5DCBEA02.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.234.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p6KCd19C076595; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:39:02 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by park.js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6KCcwAk028271; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:38:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6KCcmWh007548; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:38:53 GMT (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201107201238.p6KCcmWh007548@fire.js.berklix.net> From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:34:57 +0200." Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:38:48 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org, Dan Nelson Subject: Re: Freebsd-7.4 + std gcc 4.2.1 fails to honour -march=i586 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:39:07 -0000 > Even if we're too lazy to do anything more, we should at least > document it as a patch to man gcc. PS Please no one take offense at word "Lazy" I'm as lazy as the next man. A good engineer can be a lazy engineer, - if he works to max efficiency :-) Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below, not above; Indent with "> "; Cumulative like a play script. Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.