From owner-freebsd-security  Mon Jan 12 15:45:00 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA21120
          for security-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 15:45:00 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security)
Received: from oblivion.esgroup.net (root@oblivion.esgroup.net [209.52.174.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA21101
          for <security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 15:44:42 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from tbaur@esgroup.net)
Received: from oblivion.esgroup.net (tbaur@oblivion.esgroup.net [209.52.174.1])
	by oblivion.esgroup.net (8.8.8/ESI) with SMTP id PAA15336;
	Mon, 12 Jan 1998 15:44:34 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 15:44:34 -0800 (PST)
From: Tim Baur <tbaur@esgroup.net>
To: Robert Watson <robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org>
cc: security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: /etc/services 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980112183841.930C-100000@cyrus.watson.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.96.980112154058.15108B-100000@oblivion.esgroup.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Robert Watson wrote:

> > Uhm no. Both are needed as one is for tcp and the other for udp.
> 
> I am aware that both are needed; I refer instead to the conflict between
> doom and mdqs.  Here are the lines of interest from my services: 

Ahh yes. Point taken. Would have been good to mention this in the first
email. Wasnt exactally clear as to what you were refering to. But a very
valid point at that. 

Tim Baur
ESI Communications