From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec  7 22:33:57 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB76F106566B
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed,  7 Dec 2011 22:33:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-hackers@herveybayaustralia.com.au)
Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au
	[150.101.178.33])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9878FC13
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed,  7 Dec 2011 22:33:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au
	(laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC7555C27
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu,  8 Dec 2011 08:46:18 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <4EDFE933.3060708@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 08:31:15 +1000
From: Da Rock <freebsd-hackers@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
References: <4EDEB600.9000102@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
	<CAFHbX1KT6AoPPWY6+bYbqyVy6CXTfZsMUwjLRfKBMdOSDoXw9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EDF4703.1050705@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
	<CAFHbX1JuZPgsKCwVO5eRPm6jPk29tSANbGj82gz2eVDP1=abcQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EDF5253.5060201@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
	<CAFHbX1+RmnzA-0W2KxAC8L=n3EEtnXp7ytsgt2ZMENMmG7gvEw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111207114756.48295690@mikmeyer-vm-fedora>
In-Reply-To: <20111207114756.48295690@mikmeyer-vm-fedora>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: 64bit build errors
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:33:57 -0000

On 12/08/11 05:47, Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 12:17:57 +0000
> Tom Evans<tevans.uk@googlemail.com>  wrote:
>> The way I understand it is that they use compiler/assembler features
>> that did not exist in the version of binutils that is in base.
> Which begs the question - why isn't the new version of the tools
> (provided by ports) listed in BUILDDEPENDS in the port, then?
>
I'm not building the port. This is my own build, so the builddepends 
isn't existent.