From owner-cvs-user Mon Mar 13 17:55:46 1995 Return-Path: cvs-user-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA04964 for cvs-user-outgoing; Mon, 13 Mar 1995 17:55:46 -0800 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA04958; Mon, 13 Mar 1995 17:55:41 -0800 Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id RAA01565; Mon, 13 Mar 1995 17:55:32 -0800 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199503140155.RAA01565@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/compat20 libgcc.so.261.0.uu To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 1995 17:55:32 -0800 (PST) Cc: pst@shockwave.com, phk@freefall.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-user@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <199503140145.RAA09156@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Mar 13, 95 05:45:22 pm Content-Type: text Content-Length: 901 Sender: cvs-user-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > That does not cover all of what section 3 states, he is providing a GPL > based binary without the sources or any notice of where the sources are > or without an offer to provide the sources. Before we go balistic here, can we just take a DEEP breath ? I have not "provided" anything to anybody at this stage. I have checked it into our CVS-tree, >>> which already contains the sources <<<. OK, feel better ? As to how this is to be provided, and what measures we have to take to comply with the ($#^#&$%@&ing) GPL, is to be determined. I will have no problems checking out the source code for this, (cvs co -t RELEASE20) during the "make release" and include it in the "compat20" if that is the solution. -- Poul-Henning Kamp -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'