Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 07:40:15 -0500 From: Jim Bloom <bloom@acm.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua> Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, jsegovia@cnc.una.py, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cpp change breaks ipfw Message-ID: <38BA6CAF.7F855F3@acm.org> References: <200002271345.JAA29398@alpha.cnc.una.py> <38B98413.CB910261@acm.org> <20000227221631.A70300@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> <38B9A05F.57D2DD6D@acm.org> <20000228093703.B43907@relay.ucb.crimea.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I agree 100%. I'm going to change ipfw so that the syntax for the preprocessor becomes: ipfw [-q] [-p preprocessor [preprocessor_arguments]] file This will allow for a passing -traditional to cpp and a wider array of preprocessor in general. It does allow one to make mistakes more easily, but is a general solution to the problem. I'll post the changes when I am done. Jim Bloom bloom@acm.org Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > I don't think that documenting another program's changed behaviour is the > right thing to do. Maybe David can shed some light on this? > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38BA6CAF.7F855F3>