From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 22:42:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4229416A4CE for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:42:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C650143D69 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:42:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (scottl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB6Mkdao000998; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:46:39 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (scottl@localhost)iB6MkdKJ000995; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:46:39 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: pooker.samsco.org: scottl owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:46:39 -0700 (MST) From: Scott Long Sender: scottl@pooker.samsco.org To: Andy Smith In-Reply-To: <20041206124554.GJ43390@caffreys.strugglers.net> Message-ID: <20041206154452.V99527@pooker.samsco.org> References: <64353.192.168.0.200.1102263448.squirrel@192.168.0.200> <587369907.20041205175744@andric.com> <41B348EF.8000903@freebsd.org> <20041206124554.GJ43390@caffreys.strugglers.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD mysql and threading X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 22:42:30 -0000 On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Andy Smith wrote: > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 10:44:15AM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > > The good news is that default option of using KSE (i.e. > > libpthread) system scope threads performs about as well as > > Linuxthreads, on an SMP system. > > On a single processor 5.x system, is it still advised to use > linuxthreads with the MySQL 4.1.x port? > KSE and linuxthreads perform nearly the same, and both are definitely prefered to the old libc_r library that was standard in 5.2 and prior. There are still some reports of bugs in KSE in edge cases so you'll likely want to do your own in-house testing before deploying your database. Scott