From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 15 14:25:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0438116A4DF for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:25:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5593943D45 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:25:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.142] (helo=anti-virus02-09) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G1l4o-0000Ro-JL; Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:25:02 +0100 Received: from [82.41.34.175] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G1l4o-0007Da-1V; Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:25:02 +0100 Message-ID: <44B8FABD.8090202@dial.pipex.com> Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:25:01 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060515 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mr thooL References: <7fd86a350607150616h357e6379n3c1445858e1fcad@mail.gmail.com> <44B8F2CF.5040903@dial.pipex.com> In-Reply-To: <44B8F2CF.5040903@dial.pipex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is wrong in my conf file? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:25:05 -0000 Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > mr thooL wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> a attached my kernel configuration file, can you find the problem, >> please? >> >> "config" command went OK >> "make depend" - error code 1 >> >> thank you for help > > > No one can help you with this limited information: > > 1) attachments are not allowed on questions@ so no-one can see your > kernel. If you can make it available on a web site that is much > better than posting the whole thing here. And without 2) below it > will be less than useful. Apparently it was attached, but the error is still more important. --Alex