From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 15:11:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE23DFC8; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:11:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD2BCAEB; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:11:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-255-201.lns20.per4.internode.on.net [121.45.255.201]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t31FBKsf025573 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:11:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <551C0A92.8070507@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 23:11:14 +0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lepore , Mateusz Guzik Subject: Re: svn commit: r280955 - in head/sys: modules/notrandom dev/notrandom References: <20150401113628.GA16649@dft-labs.eu> <20150401114313.GZ64665@FreeBSD.org> <20150401115204.GB16649@dft-labs.eu> <1427897897.82583.62.camel@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1427897897.82583.62.camel@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 15:11:26 -0000 On 4/1/15 10:18 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 13:52 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: >> As a side note I'm surprised with the choice of 7. >> >> I would expect 3, no more, no less. 3 would be the number returned, >> and the number readers receive would be 3. > 5 would be right out. there is prior art for 7... I remember seeing it once.. 7, 7, 7, 7, 7 ... that's the trouble with randomness, you can't really tell.. I remember a part of a paper on the topic by Adams S, et al. I think it was towards the end of the paper. > > -- Ian > > > > >