From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 06:55:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EFA16A424; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:55:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.mao@thomson.net) Received: from dmzraw5.extranet.tce.com (dmzraw5.extranet.tce.com [157.254.234.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4097E43D45; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:55:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.mao@thomson.net) Received: from dmzraw4.extranet.tce.com (dmzraw4.extranet.tce.com [157.254.234.139]) by dmzraw5.extranet.tce.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B917B1D; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:55:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from indyvss3.am.thmulti.com (unknown [157.254.92.62]) by dmzraw4.extranet.tce.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B111148; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:55:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by indyvss3.am.thmulti.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A619BA41; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:55:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from indyvss3.am.thmulti.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (indyvss3 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07850-01-90; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:55:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from indysmailcs01.am.thmulti.com (indysmailcs01.am.thmulti.com [157.254.96.5]) by indyvss3.am.thmulti.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B59EBA43; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:55:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from indysmailbh01.am.thmulti.com ([157.254.96.4]) by indysmailcs01.am.thmulti.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 01:55:08 -0500 Received: from tahkexch2k.ap.thmulti.com ([141.11.13.12]) by indysmailbh01.am.thmulti.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 01:55:08 -0500 Received: from bjngsmail01.ap.thmulti.com ([10.11.70.35]) by tahkexch2k.ap.thmulti.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:55:04 +0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:55:01 +0800 Message-ID: <31021C278A7A6B4AB95E9A085C35521828495B@bjngsmail01> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: em(4) patch for test Thread-Index: AcXZMGNg+KtvnHgdSoOsGh4NzXiG+wAABwSw From: "Mao Shou Yan" To: "Gleb Smirnoff" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2005 06:55:04.0714 (UTC) FILETIME=[073006A0:01C5D931] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at thomson.net Cc: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: em(4) patch for test X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:55:13 -0000 NO, I didn't encounter a lot if input errors on 4.11. But I met a lot if input errors on 5.4. And I don't know why? Is this for so many CSWs( systat -vmstat 1) or any other reason? BTW, New patch loops in em_intr() like linux' NAPI. If we apply new patch, polling is necessary yet? David.Mao -----Original Message----- From: Gleb Smirnoff [mailto:glebius@FreeBSD.org]=20 Sent: 2005=C4=EA10=D4=C225=C8=D5 14:50 To: Mao Shou Yan Cc: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: em(4) patch for test On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:41:28AM +0800, Mao Shou Yan wrote: M> Can we patch it against 4.11? M> If not, can we patch the em_intr() to 4.11?=20 M> Is this patch useful to 4.11? I don't think so. Do you encounter a lot if input errors on 4.11? --=20 Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE