From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 10 18:13:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AF516A420; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:13:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AAB43D45; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:13:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1AIDcL5001404 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:13:40 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1AICpdN000962; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:12:51 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1AICpD0000961; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:12:51 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:12:50 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Joel Dahl Message-ID: <20060210181249.GA949@flame.pc> References: <200602091800.k19I0gHR024988@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060210171224.GI21499@submonkey.net> <1139592139.790.7.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <200602101235.54875.jhb@freebsd.org> <1139594811.954.14.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1139594811.954.14.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.35, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.85, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org, Ceri Davies , doc-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin , cvs-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors contrib.committers.sgml contrib.develalumni.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:13:54 -0000 On 2006-02-10 19:06, Joel Dahl wrote: >> You can use common sense though. He was obviously a ports committer. > > Guys, I'm lost. What are we arguing about? > > He was a ports committer, but I fail to see how that is important since > the Development Team Alumni doesn't differentiate between different > types of commit bits? > > Maybe I was a bit unclear with the meaning of the "unclassified commit > bit" comment; it's just a reminder, since they're still in our access > files. :-) No arguing from me. I mentioned he was the ports-meister, just in case the `unclassified' comment was meant to be a reminder of ``we don't know what this guy was working on''. It's obvious that the comment is not, since it only mentions names listed in access.unclassified, so there's nothing to argue about.