From owner-freebsd-current Sat Dec 7 9:24:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB77F37B401; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 09:24:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from MX4.estpak.ee (ld3.estpak.ee [194.126.101.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5009D43EB2; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 09:24:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kalts@estpak.ee) Received: from tiiu.internal (80-235-36-101-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.36.101]) by MX4.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5AFF1D001D; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 19:24:03 +0200 (EET) Received: from tiiu.internal (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiiu.internal (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gB7HO3CN002365; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 19:24:03 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from vallo@tiiu.internal) Received: (from vallo@localhost) by tiiu.internal (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gB7HO2Zi002364; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 19:24:02 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from vallo) Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 19:24:02 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste To: ak03@gte.com Cc: obrien@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mozilla-devel port on current Message-ID: <20021207172402.GA2273@tiiu.internal> Reply-To: kalts@estpak.ee References: <004201c29d54$0120b690$a50a1eac@jsattertop> <20021206212652.GA4342@tiiu.internal> <20021206222624.5b1098f0.kabaev@bellatlantic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021206222624.5b1098f0.kabaev@bellatlantic.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i-ja.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 10:26:24PM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 23:26:52 +0200 > Vallo Kallaste wrote: > > > I've built it yesterday together with a lots of other stuff. Using > > other -march values than i686 is unofficially claimed to be > > unsupported (kan@freebsd). As others I'll bet the -march=p4 is > > causing problems, i686 works for me. > > The only thing I "claimed" was that using -march=p4 and other options > which imply SSE2 with gcc 3.2.x is asking for trouble. Judging by the > number of bugfixes that were committed to GCC mainline for SSE2 related > problems, I am not that far off base. AFAIK, none of those bugfixes made > it back to GCC 3.2.x branch. Ok, this is a good claim and making it public will be even better. The p4 optimisation is known to be problematic and users should be notified before they'll shoot the foot off. IMO it will be a good idea to add some logic into appropriate global makefile, to notify users. It's long time problem now and comes up periodically in the lists. -- Vallo Kallaste kalts@estpak.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message